personhood rights-news

https://news.yahoo.com/u-supreme-court-rebuffs-fetal-133957590.html

 

" court took no position on "if and when prenatal life is entitled to any of the rights enjoyed after birth.""

so how about that HOV lane code?

所有跟帖: 

Person has to be born. -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (401 bytes) () 10/11/2022 postreply 12:57:49

show this to a republican. he will not agree. -hello2002- 給 hello2002 發送悄悄話 (80 bytes) () 10/11/2022 postreply 17:07:47

Some Republicans won't admit Trump Lost election, -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (116 bytes) () 10/11/2022 postreply 19:57:01

it will matter with majority vote -hello2002- 給 hello2002 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/12/2022 postreply 13:15:48

Roe v. Wade held... -akc- 給 akc 發送悄悄話 (323 bytes) () 10/11/2022 postreply 18:22:43

"does not include the unborn" -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (629 bytes) () 10/11/2022 postreply 19:55:40

so 14th amendment will prevail over state level law? -hello2002- 給 hello2002 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/12/2022 postreply 13:14:40

What do you think? -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (466 bytes) () 10/12/2022 postreply 18:28:14

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!