回複：那同理，我也不能複印書了？自己用都不可以？

來源: scoopydoo 於 2005-04-16 17:44:12 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (483 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ scoopydoo ] 在 2005-05-19 10:23:54 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
回答: 回複：有個問題：我理解為什麽要 由 scoopydoo 於 2005-04-15 22:06:58

There are exceptions as to unauthorized copy. In litigation, it is termed fair use defense. Sony's VCR case is very popular and influential in copyright law. The Court ruled that time-shift constitutes fair defense. However, the fair use defense doesn't extend to downloading motion pictures without copyright owner's consent.

As to the photocopy of testbooks, you can copy pages and chapters of a book. However, it is unlawful if you copy more than half pages of the book.

所有跟帖： 

• 普通軟件下載電影是否違法？與用錄像機錄電視節目 -有區別嗎？- ♀ 給 有區別嗎？ 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/16/2005 postreply 19:39:09

• Yes, there are -difference- ♀ 給 difference 發送悄悄話 (379 bytes) () 04/22/2005 postreply 12:22:50

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！