no I totally agree with lz's conclusion

lz was talking about experienced buyers

所有跟帖： 

• You don't save money by going dual agent or without agent becaus -勤懇兢業- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/25/2019 postreply 12:12:13

• i did. i have done all the things lz suggested and that's -gqc- ♀ (23 bytes) () 02/25/2019 postreply 12:39:53

• 知道我最不願意的客戶是怎樣的嗎，跟我看了一段時間後就沒消息了， -勤懇兢業- ♂ (293 bytes) () 02/25/2019 postreply 13:19:12

• LZ說要找幾個經紀人去看房子後在選定人，她的錢是錢，人家的經紀人的時間不值錢。 -goingplace- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/25/2019 postreply 13:28:18

• 這是雙向選擇。 -我愛蘑菇- ♀ (170 bytes) () 02/25/2019 postreply 13:35:39

• 確實有不珍惜別人勞動時間的買家。不過這不是忽悠買家的理由。我一直都好奇買方經紀如何能 -thankful- ♀ (63 bytes) () 02/25/2019 postreply 13:33:36

• 我相信有不良經紀也就有不良客人。 -我愛蘑菇- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/25/2019 postreply 18:10:54

• 沒錯。經紀有權篩選客戶，客戶同樣有權選經紀。。。 -pickshell- ♀ (113 bytes) () 02/25/2019 postreply 19:53:27

• non experienced buyer needs experienced agent; experienced buyer -gqc- ♀ (451 bytes) () 02/26/2019 postreply 10:35:08