不太適用

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 於 2016-05-11 10:00:35 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (1580 bytes)
回答: 你再讀一遍樓上的英文原文。 由 加州老李 於 2016-05-11 09:33:37
Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 以上文字的理解，應該是兩個條件（1）out of post office or letter carrier's custody (紅字部分）AND （2）before it has been delieved to the person. 那麽，收到給別人的信件，滿足第二條件，before it has been delivered to the person, 但是信件不在郵局或者郵遞人員的控製下，所以，這一段文字，並不適用於樓主的情況。 ' target='_blank'>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1702

Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 以上文字的理解，應該是兩個條件（1）out of post office or letter carrier's custody (紅字部分）AND （2）before it has been delieved to the person. 那麽，收到給別人的信件，滿足第二條件，before it has been delivered to the person, 但是信件不在郵局或者郵遞人員的控製下，所以，這一段文字，並不適用於樓主的情況。

所有跟帖： 

• 第二個條件解讀不對 -jingxi02- ♀ 給 jingxi02 發送悄悄話 (2496 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:15:55

• 私家的郵箱可能是“authorized depository for mail matter”。 -加州老李- ♂ 給 加州老李 發送悄悄話 加州老李 的博客首頁 (116 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:22:07

• 你家的信箱是authorized by whom？ -jingxi02- ♀ 給 jingxi02 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:25:38

• 根據美國刑法第194條（ § 194 of the Criminal Code） -加州老李- ♂ 給 加州老李 發送悄悄話 加州老李 的博客首頁 (872 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:33:57

• 光會google又不去研究怎樣才適用有屁用 -jingxi02- ♀ 給 jingxi02 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:38:19

• 你這種回答，我一點不意外，嗬嗬。 -加州老李- ♂ 給 加州老李 發送悄悄話 加州老李 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:40:39

• 美國最高法院的解釋，私家郵箱可以是“authorized depository for mail matter” -加州老李- ♂ 給 加州老李 發送悄悄話 加州老李 的博客首頁 (150 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:27:49

• 你是不是想說你下次從你自己家的郵箱拿出郵件時就要將你繩之於法？ -jingxi02- ♀ 給 jingxi02 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2016 postreply 10:33:41

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！