回複:補充一點:有的時候情況是很明顯的,不必大動幹戈上法庭兩敗俱

來源: wal-mart 2003-11-22 06:34:00 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (652 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ wal-mart ] 在 2004-02-03 07:43:27 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
"No fault" means one party's insurer pays the other party's damage within the former's policy limit without litigating the issue of fault (which one is more negligent and should bear more of the total damage) in the court. As explained below, A's insurer pays B's damage, while B's insurer pays A's damage. No fault insurance usually has a statutory minimum coverage (the policy limit may be higher), which may vary from state to state. If one party's damage is higher than the minimum coverage and policy limit and the other party's insurer will refuse to pay the part over the limit, of course, the parties will litigate the fault issue in the court.



請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”