看了你給的鏈接，覺得跟樓主事故沒有相似之處啊

抄錄如下：

Generally, the camp bears responsibility for keeping your children reasonably safe. Under the legal theory of premises liability, the camp owes a duty to review its activities and facilities to minimize injury risks. When a camp fails to meet these duties, such as making a swimming hole of a crocodile pond, a parent could sue the camp for injuries.

Similarly, the camp usually has a duty to perform background checks of its staff who will have contact with children. The camp organizers should be on the lookout for red flags like sex abuse and child abuse. If a camp fails to perform such background check, it could be liable for letting a child molester loose on a camp full of kids.

However, be aware that a camp is not responsible for all injuries. If you sign your child up for a risky activity like football camp, you may have to sign a waiver absolving the camp for most injuries that occur during the course of the sport. Even without a waiver, the argument can be made that you assumed the risk of injury by signing up.

Young children will get injured at summer camp. Whether the camp will be responsible will depend upon the specific facts of your situation.

所有跟帖： 

• 回應 -單身老貓- ♂ (912 bytes) () 07/10/2015 postreply 04:55:39

• 多謝大家的熱心回應,同意主要看營地是否有疏忽。 -wang_cy102- ♀ (622 bytes) () 07/10/2015 postreply 05:32:10

• 你家孩子真是多災多難。 -laoyangdelp- ♀ (63 bytes) () 07/10/2015 postreply 10:50:22

• 有點點背，倒黴的嫌疑。：（ -wang_cy102- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/10/2015 postreply 17:51:28

• 上帝 ! -單身老貓- ♂ (272 bytes) () 07/10/2015 postreply 12:29:10

• 不認為有斷章取義之嫌 -稻穗兒- ♀ (2111 bytes) () 07/10/2015 postreply 07:40:49

• 您是對的.. -單身老貓- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/10/2015 postreply 14:45:41