回應

法官可以在庭上講任何話,但是最終的判決需要看判決書中的主文.

針對您的問題,老貓的耐性已經將近用完,這事,老貓就不再多管了...

(老貓的專葉是拿耗子,管閒是的就交給狗族的朋友了 ... :-)

所有跟帖： 

• 判決書就寫了：Case Dismissed Lack of Proof as to Plaintiff. 可是他嘴上說讓我付錢修 -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:04:11

• 判決書上到底寫了什麽，是dismiss with prejudice 還是 without prejudice? -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:23:44

• JUDGE 手寫：Case Dismissed Lack of Proof As to Plaintiff. -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:27:46

• 沒有任何“prejudice"出現 -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:31:34

• It is dismissal with prejudice -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (122 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:35:51

• 這個字好專業，有點暈，請賜教。 -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 11:42:17

• 你好像很專業，請你告訴我真的是我亂埋怨JUDGE欺負我，還是他判的真的不公平？ -bolatumen- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2015 postreply 12:03:00