Restraining Order not a Proper use

來源: lexm5 2014-03-23 08:17:43 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1123 bytes)
Restraining order is usually used for domestic violence or stalking.  It requires two elements (1) defendant's bad act, (2) causes the plaintiff to be in fear of physical injury.  To use that for neighbor dispute is not entirely proper.  

First, what is the "bad act" of your neighbor?  Kids running in your yard, and come into your house to talk to you is not really criminal.  Throwing eggs on your house might be problem, but you cannot prove it was them.  

Second, even if above allegations are true, I don't think most judge would agree that you are in fear of physical injury.

You can't stop your neighbor from complaining about your renter.  Maybe you can erect a fence to stop their children from trespassing.  There are many common sense ways to resolve neighbor dispute, and so far I have not seen anything that lawyer can help you. 

If you don't agree, tell us more FACTs, get a camera and record more EVIDENCE,  not just rehash about the argument you had with your neighbor.

所有跟帖: 

Thank you all. It is true that it is hard to solve such kind of -yifangtu- 給 yifangtu 發送悄悄話 yifangtu 的博客首頁 (79 bytes) () 03/23/2014 postreply 08:27:23

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”