contributory negligence

來源: lexm5 2014-03-19 13:32:23 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1016 bytes)
Your best argument is, you are primarily negligent, and the other driver is contributory negligent by parking his car too close to you.  
Assuming the court found "contributory negligence" of the other driver:

British Columbia Negligence Act read as follows: http://www.bclaws.ca/Recon/document/ID/freeside/00_96333_01

 

1 (1) If by the fault of 2 or more persons damage or loss is caused to one or more of them, the liability to make good the damage or loss is in proportion to the degree to which each person was at fault.
   (2) Despite subsection (1), if, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, it is not possible to establish different degrees of fault, the liability must be apportioned equally.

 


Therefore, you are at least partially responsible for the damage. How much exactly depend on detail of the case and case history in your province. My guess is you are out of luck.

所有跟帖: 

LZ應該負全責吧。去加油一般是不用倒車的,所以後麵的沒留地應該是沒責任的。 -N.- 給 N. 發送悄悄話 N. 的博客首頁 (51 bytes) () 03/19/2014 postreply 13:41:28

Thanks! My back window is quite high. -appletwo- 給 appletwo 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/19/2014 postreply 16:06:08

It was a BMW behind...:( -appletwo- 給 appletwo 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/19/2014 postreply 16:13:14

Try to reduce the bill a bit.... -appletwo- 給 appletwo 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/19/2014 postreply 16:14:22

Why are you so worried? -lexm5- 給 lexm5 發送悄悄話 (634 bytes) () 03/19/2014 postreply 19:43:08

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”