回複:回複:回複:回複:ask for law cases for tenant

來源: wal-mart 2004-10-28 12:17:55 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (607 bytes)
回答: 回複:回複:ask for law cases for tenantwal-mart2004-10-27 18:37:49
Although I don't know Canadian law, normally in a civil suit, a plaintiff should satisfy the burden of proof by establishing the injury, causation between the injury and the defendant's wrongdoing, and the damages. In your case, if he did not record the previous condition of the property, how can he prove the damage-the reduced value due to the subtenant's misconduct. Additionally the landlord lost in the deposit return case. He will look bad in this case because it seems that he intend to retaliate you. Therefore, if he did sue, it would be his words against your words. I think you will be fine.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”