今天去法院拿到了罰單上的細節,大多是可以想象的到的(人沒認錯,探測設備很準確,警察受過培訓,等等)。警察提到路邊有標誌,關於我的話隻有一句:the defendant said: "I did not see the school zone sign"。
這當然和事實不符。我對措辭很小心。當時的對話大致是:" do you know the speed limit of this road" "30" "do you know the speed limit drops to 20 when the light flashes?” “I am not aware of the flashing light".
想請教老貓和各位網友,憑這點discrepancy,到法院去contest,會有用嗎?Of course Ican subpoena the cop and wishfully hope he will not be present for whatever the reason---that is another story.
謝謝各位!住華盛頓州。