you summarized the first-year law school contracts class pretty well. However, the question is never whether the contract is valid or not; rather, the question is what kind of termination clause there is. If the contract specifically provides that either party can walk way without paying any damages to the other, then the original poster would have no case.
回複:回複:房屋賣方違約,買方有何權利?
本文內容已被 [ itelya ] 在 2004-02-03 07:43:22 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
所有跟帖:
• 回複:回複:回複:房屋賣方違約,買方有何權利? -bxt- ♀ (100 bytes) () 11/06/2003 postreply 11:13:00