你應該找砍樹公司出一份證詞來說明你當時授權的範圍。畢竟你允許他們進入你花園的。

所有跟帖： 

• 你和你鄰居口說無憑。木有書麵材料，基本上沒用。現在不是辯論而是準備打官司的時候。 -jin_yin_hua- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 18:39:07

• so a battle is unavoiable? If that is the case, I am ready for i -gujiguji- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 19:05:49

• Also there is one thing that I don't understand. -gujiguji- ♀ (130 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 19:22:21

• how about: 你鄰居同你商量樹的問題，你們同意由他出錢出力。樹沒了後你反悔了。 -jin_yin_hua- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 20:28:24

• still you didn't convince me that i wanted my trees gone in the -gujiguji- ♀ (189 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 21:03:38

• 你的樹影響到了鄰居，你發善心，加上small lots的`樹根可能影響房子的地基。 -jin_yin_hua- ♂ (68 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 21:25:32

• It is a small lot. But there is no way for trees -gujiguji- ♀ (297 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 22:12:41

• I wanted to help myneighbor but it didn't mean that I had to -gujiguji- ♀ (136 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 21:32:08

• 要是他們能證明你隻要砍樹枝就好了。不然大家隻好可信度。 -jin_yin_hua- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 18:43:19

• 不過要是他們說隻砍樹枝樹活不了，更危險，你還得找其他人來反駁。 -jin_yin_hua- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 18:47:16

• As far as i know, the party who does tree trimming is liable for -gujiguji- ♀ (27 bytes) () 09/24/2013 postreply 19:02:50