回複：回複：這個5百萬有什麽根據呢？

remind you something - Immegration Officer is not policeman. Not that it makes a difference in your argument, since they are both goverment employees, but one is federal, one is state.

I think, the amount of 5mm is more of 'cry-out' amount, instead of base on solid calculations. There is no set rules to use for 'Phychological damage' anyways. I don't know what lawyers use to come up with an amount, but in this case, I think the lawyer is asking so much money to create a social effect, to make a point that he thinks this case is so serious.

This doesn't mean 5mm is a reasonable amount, doesn't mean they can get it either.

所有跟帖： 

• 她的律師已說了，她能不能要500萬，得看犯罪的罪名成不成立 -海外存知彼- ♀ (74 bytes) () 10/13/2004 postreply 05:23:21

• She may not get 5M anyway -bm- ♀ (408 bytes) () 10/13/2004 postreply 10:17:04

• 您這回貼跟在我貼子後麵，您這是同意我呢還是反對我呢？ -xxxxllll- ♂ (212 bytes) () 10/13/2004 postreply 11:32:55

• 我已經說了，能不能CHARGE到這份賠償 -海外存知彼- ♀ (123 bytes) () 10/13/2004 postreply 11:41:39

• 奇怪呀，照您這麽說我看法跟您一樣啊，您跟我爭什麽呀？ -xxxxllll- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/13/2004 postreply 11:56:16