liquidated damage

回答: 問一個和房客簽lease的事summercamp2012-05-17 13:33:24

for a liquidated damage to be enforceable, it must not be unreasonable compared to actual damage, and actual damage must be unforeseenable at time of contract. if liquidated damage is upheld, it will preclude other contractual damages. for example, if the renters sign a 12 month lease must break the lease within a day, then liquidated damage is all you can recover. contractual damage on the other hand, will give you 12 month worth of rent, subject to mitigation of course. a liquidated damage is not ticket to break the lease. the landlord can still go after the renters for specific performance, an equitable remedy. either way, if the renters breach, you cannot avoid a lawsuit. you still need to go to court to prove a contract, a breach, and damage. personally, I do not think liquidated damage in a term lease will be enforceable since the damage is not uncertain upon a renters breach.

☆ 發自Android 文學城閱覽器 4.0.11

所有跟帖: 

謝謝答複,你說我到底選幾,對自己有利? -summercamp- 給 summercamp 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/17/2012 postreply 19:36:13

liquidated damage -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (453 bytes) () 05/17/2012 postreply 20:29:36

continue -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (95 bytes) () 05/17/2012 postreply 20:30:49

continue 2 -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (174 bytes) () 05/17/2012 postreply 20:32:38

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!