回複：I don't think so

來源: 淡淡鬱金香 於 2011-04-17 10:16:29 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (239 bytes)
回答: I don't think so 由 Apt 於 2011-04-16 22:19:39

Thanks for your reply. Both of us believe I shoulf have half of that 80%.

but our Attorney said, he own 100% of the property according CA law, and

also he has the 100% rental income from the townhouse in later years.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複: Rental Income is community property as well -有感而發- ♂ 給 有感而發 發送悄悄話 (143 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 13:19:31

• 按加州法律，這是他婚前財產，氣人 -淡淡鬱金香- ♀ 給 淡淡鬱金香 發送悄悄話 淡淡鬱金香 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 15:08:16

• 回複：按加州法律，這是他婚前財產，氣人 -apt- ♂ 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (476 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 23:22:00

• Why? You and your husband acquired 80% of the house after marria -playdoh2- ♂ 給 playdoh2 發送悄悄話 (105 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 08:32:32

• In CA law, He owns this property. Does not matter how much paid -淡淡鬱金香- ♀ 給 淡淡鬱金香 發送悄悄話 淡淡鬱金香 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 11:45:33

• 回複：In CA law, He owns this property. Does not matter how much p -apt- ♂ 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (638 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 12:02:12

• like apt said, CA law didn't say he owns this property. -playdoh2- ♂ 給 playdoh2 發送悄悄話 (1160 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 12:41:11

• What do you mean our attorney? Is the attorney representing both -apt- ♂ 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 15:06:39

• 協助協議離婚的中間律師，她的職責是解釋法律條文和協調我們的財產分割 -淡淡鬱金香- ♀ 給 淡淡鬱金香 發送悄悄話 淡淡鬱金香 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 16:26:45

• 這個律師是錯的。如果有疑問就不要協議了，免得以後後悔。 -movingmountain- ♀ 給 movingmountain 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 13:37:42

• 回複：That guy is called mediator, not your attorney -有感而發- ♂ 給 有感而發 發送悄悄話 (405 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 22:07:03

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！