I don't think so

來源: Apt 於 2011-04-16 22:19:39 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (261 bytes)
回答: 離婚財產分割的鬱悶 由 淡淡鬱金香 於 2011-04-16 21:32:35

He bought it before marriage so that is his separate property, but that doesn't mean you are not entitle to nothing. If the house was paid off using community property, you are entitle to at least half of that 80%.

☆ 發自Android 文學城閱覽器 3.0.5

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：I don't think so -淡淡鬱金香- ♀ 給 淡淡鬱金香 發送悄悄話 淡淡鬱金香 的博客首頁 (239 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 10:16:29

• 回複: Rental Income is community property as well -有感而發- ♂ 給 有感而發 發送悄悄話 (143 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 13:19:31

• 按加州法律，這是他婚前財產，氣人 -淡淡鬱金香- ♀ 給 淡淡鬱金香 發送悄悄話 淡淡鬱金香 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 15:08:16

• 回複：按加州法律，這是他婚前財產，氣人 -apt- ♂ 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (476 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 23:22:00

• Why? You and your husband acquired 80% of the house after marria -playdoh2- ♂ 給 playdoh2 發送悄悄話 (105 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 08:32:32

• In CA law, He owns this property. Does not matter how much paid -淡淡鬱金香- ♀ 給 淡淡鬱金香 發送悄悄話 淡淡鬱金香 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 11:45:33

• 回複：In CA law, He owns this property. Does not matter how much p -apt- ♂ 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (638 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 12:02:12

• like apt said, CA law didn't say he owns this property. -playdoh2- ♂ 給 playdoh2 發送悄悄話 (1160 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 12:41:11

• What do you mean our attorney? Is the attorney representing both -apt- ♂ 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 15:06:39

• 協助協議離婚的中間律師，她的職責是解釋法律條文和協調我們的財產分割 -淡淡鬱金香- ♀ 給 淡淡鬱金香 發送悄悄話 淡淡鬱金香 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/17/2011 postreply 16:26:45

• 這個律師是錯的。如果有疑問就不要協議了，免得以後後悔。 -movingmountain- ♀ 給 movingmountain 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 13:37:42

• 回複：That guy is called mediator, not your attorney -有感而發- ♂ 給 有感而發 發送悄悄話 (405 bytes) () 04/18/2011 postreply 22:07:03

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！