"Long" is a manipulative term

來源: F.Magath 2004-09-13 09:14:06 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (575 bytes)
回答: "Long" is too indefiniteF.Magath2004-09-13 08:41:10
I think it is very difficult for you to prove in court that when they said "long", they meant to be bound by it. Even if they did, it is difficult for you to prove how "long" they really meant. Under such situations, they have the benefit of doubt because as a plaintiff, you bear the burden of proof.

Sometimes words are cheap, words such as "long" give you a false impression, yet they are not legally binding. Also "they wanted you to work long" is not good enough. It is only an expression of wish, not a definite, binding, bargained-for contract term.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”