回複:剛得到律師的回複:

來源: apt 2011-01-13 14:12:55 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (921 bytes)
回答: 剛得到律師的回複:howlongwaiting2011-01-13 13:57:47

He is correct. The court has jurisdiction over the child but not your ex. The court can decide who and where to raise the child but the court cannot force the guy to pay for child support, unless the guy has some kind of minimum contact with TX that the allows the court to find jurisdiction. I am not familiar with TX law but this analysis is based on constitutional analysis. I doubt the TX court will assert jurisdiction over your ex only because he wrote a letter to the court. Unless he unequivocally consents to the TX jurisdiction, minimum usually means much more than that.

What your attorney should do is to first, establish paternity of the father; second, use child custody as bargain chip to get child support from him, understanding you may never get 100% custody and may never get this guy out of your life until the child reaches majority. Same thing goes for the uninsured medical expenses.

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”