剛得到律師的回複:

來源: howlongwaiting 2011-01-13 13:57:47 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (953 bytes)
回答: apt 老師,還有一點需要請教:howlongwaiting2011-01-13 13:23:54
Just want to clarify - you are correct in that the UCCJEA statue you found gives Texas the power to address child custody issues.  However, it does not give Texas the power to address child support.  And the problem we're having in your case is not about child custody, but about child support and medical support.  The only way Texas would have the right to have the power to address the child support and medical support issues is if your hu*****and has lived here during the marriage or he was personally served with the divorce papers while in Texas.  That is why I am hoping that the Court will accept your hu*****and's Answer that was filed with the Court as him agreeing to let Texas address all issues including child support.  That is also why I told you that you need to be prepared to let go of the child support and medical support issues if the Judge will only agree to do the divorce and child custody.  

所有跟帖: 

回複:剛得到律師的回複: -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 apt 的博客首頁 (921 bytes) () 01/13/2011 postreply 14:12:55

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”