證據相當清楚

來源: fourwaves 於 2016-06-05 09:01:26 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (491 bytes)
回答: 一麵之詞而已 由 bridge008 於 2016-06-04 22:05:34

This evidence, however, is still questionable based on the discovery, in the Inquest and after, that Leibniz both back-dated and changed fundamentals of his 'original' notes, not only in this intellectual conflict, but in several others (he also published 'anonymous' slanders of Newton regarding their controversy which he tried, initially, to claim he was not author of)。

所有跟帖： 

• 搞了半天不還是一麵之詞麽 -bridge008- ♂ 給 bridge008 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 09:27:42

• 那天到波蘭國家圖書館看萊的筆記本 -fourwaves- ♂ 給 fourwaves 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 09:37:53

• 萊和朋友的通信裏也有記錄，這個已經不是爭議了。爭議是以前的事，為牛頓爭名分 -bridge008- ♂ 給 bridge008 發送悄悄話 (131 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 09:46:07

• 記錄的時間與內容很重要，不是向你這樣三言兩語就打發過去 -fourwaves- ♂ 給 fourwaves 發送悄悄話 (50 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 14:19:16

• 這個就不用爭了吧，現在公認萊布尼茨獨自創立的為微積分理論 -bridge008- ♂ 給 bridge008 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 18:24:21

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！