即使不考慮樣本代表性和物種差異性結果也沒有規律（虛線和實線），不可過分解讀。

Fig. 1. Mortality of rats fed GMO treated or not with Roundup, and effects of Roundup alone. Rats were fed with NK603 GM maize (with or without application of Roundup) at three different doses (11, 22, 33% in their diet: thin, medium and bold lines, respectively) compared to the substantially equivalent closest isogenic non-GM maize (control, dotted line). Roundup was administrated in drinking water at 3 increasing doses, same symbols (environmental (A), MRL in agricultural GMOs (B) and half of minimal agricultural levels (C), see Section 2). Lifespan during the experiment for the control group is represented by the vertical bar ± SEM (grey area). In bar histograms, the causes of mortality before the grey area are detailed in comparison to the controls (0). In black are represented the necessary euthanasia because of suffering in accordance with ethical rules (tumors over 25% body weight, more than 25% weight loss, hemorrhagic bleeding, etc.); and in hatched areas, spontaneous mortality.

所有跟帖： 

• 他的麵鋪的很開，但因為對照組太小，結論不可靠。就像你調查十個人支持哪一位總統候選人。 -湘西山民- ♂ (68 bytes) () 09/29/2012 postreply 05:47:50

• 以前的試驗對照組好像沒有十個的。這篇文章的試驗設計和對實驗結果的解釋問題很多，不足為信。 -湘西山民- ♂ (56 bytes) () 09/29/2012 postreply 06:44:11

• 謝謝提供。回頭再讀。 -湘西山民- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2012 postreply 12:06:54

• 看你也沒有科學態度，玩的是政治遊戲，不說也罷。 -湘西山民- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2012 postreply 16:14:49

• 你的毛病是亂猜測，自以為是。 -湘西山民- ♂ (71 bytes) () 09/30/2012 postreply 07:10:56