我批判的不是個人,而是瞎子摸象的思考方式。

來源: kabab 2010-08-26 23:53:19 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (734 bytes)
I don't want to have a long debate with this. All those envidences in the origianl article are so weak compare to common sense.
For example:
至於人接觸這種汙染後的海水對皮膚,眼睛,鼻子,內髒(因為總會有一些微量的海水通過鼻嘴進入人體的)有什麽長期的惡性影響,現在醫學還沒有定論,但我是不會冒這個險,以自己來做小白鼠的。。。
Have you ever contact gasoline, diesel, asphalt, etc., are those things killing you? When you smell gasoline, how much gasoline goes into your body? When you sit on asphalt ground, do you have shower immediately? Now you need scientists and doctors to study the tiny oil impact on human. LOL.

That's the example of why lot of highly educated people are actually dumb. They lost common sense.

所有跟帖: 

謝謝你的參與討論, 和你爭論沒有任何意義: 浪費時間。 原油比汽油和柴油含更毒的致癌雜環芳香化合物。你最好找個懂化工和生物化 -9753- 給 9753 發送悄悄話 9753 的博客首頁 (404 bytes) () 08/27/2010 postreply 11:19:30

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”