我查了下wiki的說法,和百度的說法倒是一致

來源: 人約黃昏後 2014-06-10 20:09:42 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (8479 bytes)

 

Environmental impact of the coal industry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_the_coal_industry#Radiation_exposure


Radiation exposure[edit]

Coal also contains low levels of uraniumthorium, and other naturally occurring radioactive isotopes whose release into the environment may lead to radioactive contamination.[20][47] Coal plants emit radiation in the form of radioactive fly ash which is inhaled and ingested by neighbours, and incorporated into crops. A 1978 paper from Oak Ridge National Laboratory estimated that coal-fired power plants of that time may contribute a whole-body committed dose of 19 µSv/yr to their immediate neighbours in a 500 m radius.[48] The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation's 1988 report estimated the committed dose 1 km away to be 20 µSv/yr for older plants or 1µSv/yr for newer plants with improved fly ash capture, but was unable to confirm these numbers by test.[49] A single PWR spent fuel bundle, after 10 years cooldown, with no shielding, emits 2.3 MSv/yr, a trillion times more than coal.[50] However, if we exclude contained waste and ignore unintentional releases from nuclear plants, coal-plants carry more radioactive wastes into the environment than nuclear plants producing the same amount of energy. Plant-emitted radiation carried by coal-derived fly ash delivers 100 times more radiation to the surrounding environment than does the normal operation of a similarly productive nuclear plant.[51] This comparison does not consider the rest of the fuel cycle, i.e., coal and uranium mining and refining and waste disposal.




所有跟帖: 

你要注意人家的用此-may,以及if we exclude... -Sunnylian.- 給 Sunnylian. 發送悄悄話 (135 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:13:42

”甚至比火電站周圍還要低“,也是不確定的說法吧 -人約黃昏後- 給 人約黃昏後 發送悄悄話 人約黃昏後 的博客首頁 (153 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:21:48

”煤含有放射性元素“也基本上是個中性描述,並沒有”一定會造成危害“的意思 -人約黃昏後- 給 人約黃昏後 發送悄悄話 人約黃昏後 的博客首頁 (38 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:24:32

不是敏感不敏感的問題,而是要謹慎呀,同學 -Sunnylian.- 給 Sunnylian. 發送悄悄話 (226 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:29:29

笑,這麽多資料都是相同觀點,你還認為是‘信口開活” -人約黃昏後- 給 人約黃昏後 發送悄悄話 人約黃昏後 的博客首頁 (323 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:36:39

科學界的觀點? -Sunnylian.- 給 Sunnylian. 發送悄悄話 (108 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:40:04

死不認錯?嗬,百度/wiki裏難道不是引述的科學研究的論文麽 -人約黃昏後- 給 人約黃昏後 發送悄悄話 人約黃昏後 的博客首頁 (92 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:45:15

好的,到此為止吧,我們沒有必要為了老方再爭論下去。話不投機半句多。 -Sunnylian.- 給 Sunnylian. 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 20:49:56

要話投機的應該去流坦,一個帖子萬千讚 -人約黃昏後- 給 人約黃昏後 發送悄悄話 人約黃昏後 的博客首頁 (26 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 21:36:15

英文的、剛剛的 -飯盛男- 給 飯盛男 發送悄悄話 飯盛男 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/10/2014 postreply 23:19:57

co: -王翠花- 給 王翠花 發送悄悄話 王翠花 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/12/2014 postreply 00:58:38

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”