Thanks. This is for RFE.

來源: 讓人信服嗎?。 2005-05-10 12:39:59 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (326 bytes)
Actually this is what I included im my letter responding to RFE. In the first petition, the "intrinsic merit" and "benefit of national scope" have been recognized by the INS. What the required is evidence that I am very excellent compared with my research peers. Therefore, I didn't emphasized the first two points again.

所有跟帖: 

In that case, this is fine -MyOpinion,- 給 MyOpinion, 發送悄悄話 (579 bytes) () 05/10/2005 postreply 12:46:30

回複:You are right, -讓人信服嗎?。。- 給 讓人信服嗎?。。 發送悄悄話 (388 bytes) () 05/10/2005 postreply 12:56:06

Not necessarily native America -GoodLuck.- 給 GoodLuck. 發送悄悄話 (836 bytes) () 05/10/2005 postreply 13:11:01

回複:Thanks. -YouHelpful- 給 YouHelpful 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/10/2005 postreply 14:25:47

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”