回複：2008年次貸危機導致許多人失業，錯在美方，移民局網開一麵，隻要有解雇信，不追究I-140。

再後來，TN一年期限變成3年，越來越鬆。但並不可以就此認為I-140就不是把柄。
-Do you have any law/policy from USCIS or CBP to justify your conclusion or it is just your speculation? The USCBP documents I cited above is still valid, don't you think so? When we discuss something on immigration, we should base on the immigration law/policy and believe most immigration officers follow the law to do their job. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense to discuss it if it is just based on some specific cases which may result from the immigration officer's mistake.

所有跟帖： 

• 不是我的推測，而是移民法在實踐中的應用。 -python2012- ♂ (765 bytes) () 02/13/2014 postreply 23:37:18