Thanks. But to me, this is out of a common sense: Brothers or si

來源: conway 2011-11-27 22:30:00 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (837 bytes)

-Your step-son is considered as your immediate relative (treated as your biological son), the same status as your wife, so you need to file a separate I-130 for him. This is different from non-immediate relatvies of US citizen, e.g. brothers/sisters of a US citizen, etc.

Thanks. But to me, this is out of a common sense: Brothers or sisters can take their spouse and children to immigrate together, but the immediate relatives - father, mother or spouse cannot. This could give better immigration benefits to brothers and sisters than to the immediate relatives and then treat them much better than the immediate relatives. How could the Congress make such a law? What is a rationale to make the law? This is why the I-130 instructions confuse me.

所有跟帖: 

回複:Thanks. But to me, this is out of a common sense: Brothers or -863211- 給 863211 發送悄悄話 863211 的博客首頁 (851 bytes) () 11/28/2011 postreply 09:25:38

回複:回複:Thanks. But to me, this is out of a common sense: Brothers -conway- 給 conway 發送悄悄話 (1251 bytes) () 11/28/2011 postreply 19:29:09

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”