緊急請教有關NIW要求補充引用的問題，謝謝!

緊急請教有關NIW要求補充引用的問題，謝謝

我個人的情況是趕在去年8月前遞了DIY的NIW的申請， 在NSC。當時因為隻有兩周時間，所以隻能DIY，推薦信也很著急的情況下有什麽就用什麽了。當時我隻有一篇不是第一作者的文章發表。現在收到補件通知，非常簡單的要求我補充文章的引用。從文章發表到現在一年時間裏我找到了11個引用（其中5個是綜述，1個是Editorial）, 所有作者來自9個國家，而且全部是臨床醫生引用；也被文章所發雜誌（IF：10）的主編在該雜誌年度綜述中提出來說非常有價值。我收到的補件通知原文如此：

The evidence submitted in support of the petition does not demonstrate a level of work that will serve the national interest to substantially greater degree than would a available U。S worker having the same minimum qualifications。In other words，the evidence in the record does not show that the self-petitioner has distinguished himself above other researcher in the same field。The petitioner must establish that he will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would a available U。S researcher having the same minimum qualfications。The peririoner must demonstate that his woek has impacted or influenced the field of endeavor as a whole。

For the aforementioned reasons，in order testablish eligibility，please submit following：

Copies of published articles by other researchers citing or orher wise recognizing the petitoner’s research and/or contributions。Highlight the portion of the paper that references the petitioner’s work，in the biblography or the “works cirted”section。It is not necessary to submit articles that are self-referencing.

The evidence submitted with the petition has already been considered；therefore， please DO NOT re-submit the same evidence。

請問象我這種情況是否按信裏所提就直接按要求補引用就行了？但我文章發表時間短，現在隻有上麵所提的11個引用。是否能讓VO信服, 證明我比同行的美國人強呢？還是應該找個律師從新整理各種有用的材料，比如補充推薦信，最近又發表的PAPER和abstract，和一些其他的證據呢？總之，怎麽提出讓人信服, 證明我比同行的美國人強？怎麽這種情況下我到底能做些什麽，怎麽做？謝謝！

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：緊急請教有關NIW要求補充引用的問題，謝謝! -fsa2000- ♀ (273 bytes) () 09/28/2008 postreply 19:55:38

• what is IO #? -tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 09:04:54

• I think you need a good lawyer -cowboy001- ♂ (462 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 10:18:31

• 謝謝,我剛打電話問過幾個律師了,看起來挺麻煩的,都說要從新做 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (43 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 10:24:43

• 當然是重新做 -cowboy001- ♂ (142 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:10:45

• 謝謝,我下午和律師談過了,要補充很多材料,原來我想太簡單了 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (32 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 16:00:34

• 是這樣的。 -cowboy001- ♂ (189 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 16:30:39

• 謝謝,我找過他了,但是他不接我的CASE,說我的PAPER不是 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (282 bytes) () 09/30/2008 postreply 09:43:08

• Hi Cowboy001, did you get approval for your RFE? -tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 10:32:34

• yes, I did. also I did not have very strong background -cowboy001- ♂ (360 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 14:58:50

• Cong? How long does it take after NSC received your response? Th -Tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:19:56

• about 12-13 days -cowboy001- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:31:50

• Thanks -Tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:21:11

• I got the exact same RFE as yours. My IO is 0175 -Tom2007- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 15:57:14

• 你找律師了嗎?我把信放在單位了,等我看看告訴你IO的號碼 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (113 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 20:13:01

• 回複：你找律師了嗎?我把信放在單位了,等我看看告訴你IO的號碼 -tom2007- ♂ (27 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 20:20:35

• 我看了IO的號碼和你的一樣,哈哈,看來我們是一條船上的了 -繁忙的2006- ♀ (36 bytes) () 09/29/2008 postreply 20:18:23