緊急請教有關NIW要求補充引用的問題，謝謝!

緊急請教有關NIW要求補充引用的問題，謝謝

我個人的情況是趕在去年8月前遞了DIY的NIW的申請， 在NSC。當時因為隻有兩周時間，所以隻能DIY，推薦信也很著急的情況下有什麽就用什麽了。當時我隻有一篇不是第一作者的文章發表。現在收到補件通知，非常簡單的要求我補充文章的引用。從文章發表到現在一年時間裏我找到了11個引用（其中5個是綜述，1個是Editorial）, 所有作者來自9個國家，而且全部是臨床醫生引用；也被文章所發雜誌（IF：10）的主編在該雜誌年度綜述中提出來說非常有價值。我收到的補件通知原文如此：

The evidence submitted in support of the petition does not demonstrate a level of work that will serve the national interest to substantially greater degree than would a available U。S worker having the same minimum qualifications。In other words，the evidence in the record does not show that the self-petitioner has distinguished himself above other researcher in the same field。The petitioner must establish that he will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than would a available U。S researcher having the same minimum qualfications。The peririoner must demonstate that his woek has impacted or influenced the field of endeavor as a whole。

For the aforementioned reasons，in order testablish eligibility，please submit following：

Copies of published articles by other researchers citing or orher wise recognizing the petitoner’s research and/or contributions。Highlight the portion of the paper that references the petitioner’s work，in the biblography or the “works cirted”section。It is not necessary to submit articles that are self-referencing.

The evidence submitted with the petition has already been considered；therefore， please DO NOT re-submit the same evidence。

請問象我這種情況是否按信裏所提就直接按要求補引用就行了？但我文章發表時間短，現在隻有上麵所提的11個引用。是否能讓VO信服, 證明我比同行的美國人強呢？還是應該找個律師從新整理各種有用的材料，比如補充推薦信，最近又發表的PAPER和abstract，和一些其他的證據呢？總之，怎麽提出讓人信服, 證明我比同行的美國人強？怎麽這種情況下我到底能做些什麽，怎麽做？謝謝！