Thanks, Pjiang!
"Guess your attorney knew what he said contradicts with USCIS I-485 Standard Operating Procedure"
If so, what can I do with my lawyer? Could you give me some advice? I wanted to maintain kind of cooperative relations with him. But it looks like he told me things contradictive with USCIS procedure. He asked me to just WAIT for my 485 to be approved in 2008, while my EB3 PD is 2005.
The legal assistant advised me to file 485 based on EB3 last July. Even today both them insist that 485 can be approved even if PD is not current.
Given the situation, should I point out to my lawyer that his words are contradictive with USCIS procedure?
Should I persuade him and pay him to help relink my EB2 140 to the pending 485?
If I relink by myself, I guess I still need to inform my lawyer since USCIS might call him in the fure. right?
"Guess your attorney knew what he said contradicts with USCIS I-485 Standard Operating Procedure"
If so, what can I do with my lawyer? Could you give me some advice? I wanted to maintain kind of cooperative relations with him. But it looks like he told me things contradictive with USCIS procedure. He asked me to just WAIT for my 485 to be approved in 2008, while my EB3 PD is 2005.
The legal assistant advised me to file 485 based on EB3 last July. Even today both them insist that 485 can be approved even if PD is not current.
Given the situation, should I point out to my lawyer that his words are contradictive with USCIS procedure?
Should I persuade him and pay him to help relink my EB2 140 to the pending 485?
If I relink by myself, I guess I still need to inform my lawyer since USCIS might call him in the fure. right?
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
