court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to adjudiate this action

來源: bioinfo 2007-10-09 21:25:14 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (316 bytes)
that's most (if not all) government argue that. If you can find citation to support that this court has jurisdiction over this kind of case, then it is easy to prove that the delay is unreasonable, and at least keep hearing. Remember, there can be many explaination for any article, that's why the result is mixed.

所有跟帖: 

Thanks for reply! Bless you!回複:court lacks subject matter jurisd -rstuvw- 給 rstuvw 發送悄悄話 (55 bytes) () 10/09/2007 postreply 21:30:50

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”