我以前的一個帖子供你參考

The moment someone enters the I485 club, it is clear that his PD is "current" as of that day, and that is why he/she was in the club. But between that time and the case coming to adjudication, if the visa number is not available (not as per PD, but just the availability of visa number from DOS), then such cases will be stacked in a separate shelf sorted by the PD. These cases will be reviewed periodically (monthly) and approved. So, I still hold the point that PD is not considered for adjudication, only visa availability from DOS at that instance of time.

--- 總結一下是說排期隻是個對供與求的估計，排期到了不一定有號兒（特別是現在財年馬上就要結束，中印這樣僧多粥少的國家號兒已經沒了），不current不一定沒號（特別是那些僧少粥多的國家）。批不批關鍵是有沒有號兒，而不是排期，特指對現在財年最後一個月，有號兒不用肯定作廢，不用省著以防PD早的NC突然在這最後一分鍾過了給耽誤了。

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：我以前的一個帖子供你參考 -MPOS- ♂ (110 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 09:39:23

• 同意. 7月都有名額時, 各國的名額是怎麽分的哪? -北京胡同小四兒- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 09:43:35

• 回複：同意. 7月都有名額時, 各國的名額是怎麽分的哪? -MPOS- ♂ (168 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 09:50:38

• 請問您哪兒看到印度拿的EB多呀，各國的額度不互相調用是法定 -jsquare- ♀ (26 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 09:54:24

• 回複：請問您哪兒看到印度拿的EB多呀，各國的額度不互相調用是法定 -MPOS- ♂ (287 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 10:09:01

• 很值得思考的是為什麽中國人沒真的拿到那些名額， -MPOS- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 10:12:49

• 對呀，我也不明白 -jsquare- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 10:18:26

• family-based和EB是同一個pool的指標，印度EB GC多是因為family based少 -jsquare- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 10:01:33

• 印度EB GC多是因為family based的少 -jsquare- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 10:02:00

• 明白了. 您是高人啊!!! 怎麽在這沒見過你的貼啊? -北京胡同小四兒- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 09:41:35

• 不是高人，是北京人。四兒也是北京人吧？ -jsquare- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/21/2007 postreply 10:07:30