The situation is particularly critical because of the USCIS decision not to accept the I-485 filings without the medical report. AILA demanded leniency but the USCIS reportely refused to accept such demand. Since medical report is "initial evidence" to I-485 filing, under the recent rule change, any I-485 filing with the medical report can be rejected or denied. Reports indicate that there are a huge backlog in scheduling medical examination in most of the areas in the country.
06/27/2007: SPECIAL ALERT: I-485 Cap for FY 2007 Can Be Exhauste
The situation is particularly critical because of the USCIS decision not to accept the I-485 filings without the medical report. AILA demanded leniency but the USCIS reportely refused to accept such demand. Since medical report is "initial evidence" to I-485 filing, under the recent rule change, any I-485 filing with the medical report can be rejected or denied. Reports indicate that there are a huge backlog in scheduling medical examination in most of the areas in the country.
所有跟帖:
•
可否給出link? 這有可能是部分無良律師蠱惑人心,借機招徠生意
-stevenj-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
19:04:52
•
immigration-law.com
-causley-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
19:08:11
•
www.immigration-law.com有轉
-toosad-
♀
(113 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
19:10:01
•
仔細通讀,發現此片文章矛盾百出,是為不可采信
-stevenj-
♂
(120 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
19:11:04
•
無風不起浪,還是要盡快交。
-causley-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
19:14:44
•
也有可能就象H1一樣,名額滿拉,發個通知,不再接收。
-causley-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
19:23:28
•
if you read it carefully
-gc2020-
♂
(306 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
19:24:43
•
回複:仔細通讀,發現此片文章矛盾百出,是為不可采信
-GCWHERE-
♂
(35 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
20:48:18
•
you didn't read/understand it correctly
-myturnnow-
♂
(587 bytes)
()
06/28/2007 postreply
00:20:10
•
文章有不少語法錯誤, 水平是差了點! 但還是值得考慮.
-隨風而去-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
06/27/2007 postreply
23:27:53
•
What means? "any I-485 filing with the medical report can be rej
-needwait..-
♂
(103 bytes)
()
06/28/2007 postreply
01:35:15
•
typo, should be "without"
-gc2020-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
06/28/2007 postreply
05:08:40