回複：回複：請教明白人關於拿到綠卡馬上跳槽的疑問

Thanks for sharing this info.

In your words: "If GC is based on a pure offer, i.e., you start that position only after GC issued". I'm a bit of in confusion......."after GC issued"? You start a new position with issued GC, that sounds to me the new position has nothing to do with GC since is has been issued in before.

Again, thanks

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：回複：回複：請教明白人關於拿到綠卡馬上跳槽的疑問 -Endurance- ♂ (378 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 20:33:53

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：請教明白人關於拿到綠卡馬上跳槽的疑問 -好多問號- ♀ (246 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:28:02

• “並非公司通知移民局撤銷”那麽簡單，看我下麵的貼 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:30:52

• 回複：“並非公司通知移民局撤銷”那麽簡單，看我下麵的貼 -好多問號- ♀ (178 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:35:33

• 那樣對公司也沒有什麽好處，因為如調查的結論是這樣，公司 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (70 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:45:12

• 回複：那樣對公司也沒有什麽好處，因為如調查的結論是這樣，公司 -好多問號- ♀ (128 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:50:34

• 回複：那樣對公司也沒有什麽好處，因為如調查的結論是這樣，公司 -好多問號- ♀ (38 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 22:01:02

• 您想太多了 -toosad- ♀ (59 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:47:23

• 回複：回複：“並非公司通知移民局撤銷”那麽簡單，看我下麵的貼 -myturnnow- ♂ (1558 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:50:25

• there was NOT such a job or intent -myturnnow- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:52:10

• 回複：there was NOT such a job or intent -好多問號- ♀ (32 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:59:45

• 隻要求你file 485的時候有意願為那個公司工作吧 -ilovemomidad- ♂ (61 bytes) () 06/12/2007 postreply 06:59:43

• 你的邏輯推理有問題吧 -myturnnow- ♂ (144 bytes) () 06/12/2007 postreply 09:04:46

• 公司故意說其實當初沒有什麽永久職位 -myturnnow- ♂ (106 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:58:56

• 不是這意思 -toosad- ♀ (613 bytes) () 06/11/2007 postreply 21:45:06