Eventually got the RFE from NSC as follows;
The documentation ted is not sufficient to warrant favorable consideration of your petition/application.
.......
(please Note: the evidence already ted demonstrates that the proposed research employment has substantial intrinsic merit and is national in scope.).
Provide additional documentary evidence that, as of the filing date of the petition, you had a degree of influence on your field that distinguishes you from other scientists with comparable academic/professional qualifications. The evidence may include, for example, copies of additional published articles that recognized your research achievements. Similarly, evidence of official recognition conferred on your by government entities or professional organizations may also be ted.
Question: Is this a tough question or a routine question? Besides additional reference letter, related publication which is ted before the filing date, more citations of previous publication after the filing date. What else would be helpful in this case? Thanks.
NIW RFE 請教!
所有跟帖:
• 回複:NIW RFE 請教! -bluemoood- ♂ (394 bytes) () 09/30/2006 postreply 19:45:25
• NIW RFE 查詢 -jiebai- ♂ (5412 bytes) () 09/30/2006 postreply 19:47:28
• 謝謝! -bluemoood- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/30/2006 postreply 19:49:46
• More 查詢 -jiebai- ♂ (10626 bytes) () 09/30/2006 postreply 19:50:00
• So,Keyword is NIW AND RFE? thanks. -bluemoood- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/30/2006 postreply 19:52:53
• Keyword is NIW RFE -jiebai- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/30/2006 postreply 19:55:53
• Appreciate! -bluemoood- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/30/2006 postreply 20:00:51
• my comments -fsa2000- ♀ (855 bytes) () 10/01/2006 postreply 10:32:29