To WorthIt: regarding your post of NIW secrets & its stragtegy

http://web.wenxuecity.com/BBSView.php?SubID=immigration&MsgID=130071

"To go through LC process to get your Green Card, you need to prove the labor shortage occurs in the market."

"If you can prove “B” >> “A”, then you can say the national interest would be adversely affected if you were asked to go through LC process."

If a petitioner qualifies for both of the conditions, i.e. (1) labor shortage occurs in the marker; (2) the petitioner is superior to his/her peers, then how can the petitioner definitely say s/he should go through the NIW instead of LC, since the national interest won't be affected (and can even be satisfied) with the LC way due to short labor?

Does a petition have to clearly address the issue of labor market by pointing out if it's in shortage or not? If the answer is "Yes", then how to deal with the question I am asking?

Hoping I am not asking a stupid question. Thanks for clarification!

所有跟帖： 

• Experienced attorney should be able to handle this. -huhuhu1941- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 18:07:51

• I am also confused on the logic of -youknow- ♀ (916 bytes) () 04/11/2006 postreply 18:52:17

• 回複：To WorthIt: regarding your post of NIW secrets & its strag -WorthIt- ♂ (94 bytes) () 04/12/2006 postreply 09:37:35

• See what a lawyer said!! -WorthIt- ♂ (64 bytes) () 04/12/2006 postreply 10:06:37

• 回複：See what a lawyer said!! -youknow- ♀ (468 bytes) () 04/12/2006 postreply 14:12:25