NIW standards

來源: newniw 2005-10-19 11:28:24 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (407 bytes)
I read a lot of the AAO cases, INS seems take the number of citations very seriouly. if there is not many citations, a number of independent letters sometimes convinced them, but not all the time. in the cases they denied, AAO argue that the independent witness did not specify how the petitioner's work influenced their research.

one thing I found if that INS is not consistent in the third prong.

所有跟帖: 

回複:NIW standards -sdfsdfsdff- 給 sdfsdfsdff 發送悄悄話 (368 bytes) () 10/19/2005 postreply 13:08:43

回複:NIW standards -bigjerry- 給 bigjerry 發送悄悄話 (51 bytes) () 10/19/2005 postreply 17:54:25

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”