NVDA--的risk

本文內容已被 [ 未知就是風險 ] 在 2024-09-01 07:53:12 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

看到這麽多勞模在網上分享看法,也利用這個長周末進一步談談我對NVDA 的GM和future  銷售的看法。

首先,no recommendation on trade,

其次, I may be wrong;

再次, 我有一點NVDAshort position--small weight。  

 

好了,先談談NVDA的GM。 我擔心,NVDA的GM has hit inflection point, and will do lower from here. 我在上周的帖子裏麵講到,GM is coming down from Q1, Q2, Q3, and in Q4 we may see a bigger Gross margin degradation. Here is a math: Q1 GM is 78%, q2 is 75%plus, and q3 will be down a little big. But if the GM margin for the year is mid 70%, Q4 will be around 72%. 

Keep in mind, we will see a ramping up of Blackwell in Q4, yet, the GM in Q4 will come down 3pts. investors may ask why. Here is my thinking。 同學們還記得NVDA's GTC 嗎? NVDA announced Blackwell and its price. Before GTC,  the street's consenuse was $70,000; yet NVDA's announce price was a little below that. What does that mean? meaning, Blackwell's GM could be lower. However, Q1 reported 78% GM, investors felt comfortable that NVDA could sell higher GM service /produce along with Blackwell to make up its margin in future. 

Now based on NVDA's guidance, looks like, with the pick up of the Blackwell volumn, the margin may come down further 

Why blackwell's price lower than consensus? may be due to competition or maintain its market share?

其次, sales。 NVDA 給出了一個指引, 然後+/-2%.  therefore, it is a real posssiblity that the Q3 sales will be 2% below the mid point.  From risk management perspective, what if the -2% actually happen? How many investors  will push the stock to all time high with this risk in mind?

 

最後,投資者也不必恐慌,畢竟NVDA依然是AI的龍頭,依然報出了靚麗的財報,華爾街研究員依然在唱好。對任何投資者,大或小,恐慌都會hurt. 

再重複一遍,我有小的short position,  no recommendation. 這些分析可能是錯誤的。

 

 

 

所有跟帖: 

有理有據,棒。 我同時也看到nvda chip在其他國家的運用還沒跟上。TA上看,周線不樂觀。 -cnrhm2017- 給 cnrhm2017 發送悄悄話 cnrhm2017 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 07:59:51

謝謝。 -未知就是風險- 給 未知就是風險 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 11:50:00

補充說一下margin問題。其實之前的財報會議上英偉達自己解釋得很清楚了 -害怕- 給 害怕 發送悄悄話 (493 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 09:20:49

謝謝你的補充,是我疏漏了Q1的高margin的原因 -未知就是風險- 給 未知就是風險 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 11:50:56

看了一篇英文分析文章寫的?裏麵夾雜幾個中文,不知所雲 -青裁- 給 青裁 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 10:18:00

對你不懂英文充滿深深的同情。 -未知就是風險- 給 未知就是風險 發送悄悄話 (303 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 11:57:27

好文,原創? -dividend_growth- 給 dividend_growth 發送悄悄話 dividend_growth 的博客首頁 (289 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 11:34:44

100%的原創 -未知就是風險- 給 未知就是風險 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 11:57:54

一般來說,芯片的利潤率是有限的。高產量並不意味著高利潤,且產量也不可能很高。 -庭卉- 給 庭卉 發送悄悄話 庭卉 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/01/2024 postreply 15:56:54

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!