謝謝回答,感覺每個人水平不一樣,沒有 margin 保護是個麻煩

來源: 李長春 2023-12-22 18:36:48 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (877 bytes)
回答: sweep to insured bank account雙簧管2023-12-22 14:10:40

Commonly, a trader who primarily deals with futures might opt for option 1.
This is mainly because this option allows the fund to be immediately
available as a margin collateral. This is critical in futures trading where
positions need to be rapidly entered and exited. The drawback of not earning
any interest on these funds is often outweighed by the advantages of having
the funds readily available for trading.

For an individual who trades both equity stocks and futures, option 2 or 3
might be a better fit. The ability to earn interest on the un-used fund and
the higher insurance cap, especially in option 3, becomes more attractive.
Whether they choose option 2 or option 3 would depend largely on how
frequently and rapidly they need to move large funds in and out of the
market.

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”