If the Government takes care of Sillicon Valley Bank depositors, but the share holders are wiped out, what is the legal basis for that? Why share holders don't get bailed out?
I'm just curious. I don't hold SVB stocks.
If the Government takes care of Sillicon Valley Bank depositors, but the share holders are wiped out, what is the legal basis for that? Why share holders don't get bailed out?
I'm just curious. I don't hold SVB stocks.
• 股東享受紅利的同時也有還債的義務,資不抵債就raise capital,追加投資失敗就破產。 -BeyondWind- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/12/2023 postreply 10:37:50