“The Attack on Mers-el-Kébir (Battle of Mers-el-Kébir) on 3 July 1940, during the Second World War, was a British naval attack on neutral French Navy ships”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Mers-el-K%C3%A9bir
應該戰戰兢兢的是書的作者
“The Attack on Mers-el-Kébir (Battle of Mers-el-Kébir) on 3 July 1940, during the Second World War, was a British naval attack on neutral French Navy ships”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Mers-el-K%C3%A9bir
應該戰戰兢兢的是書的作者
•
有沒有法國人視角寫的二戰曆史書推薦?書裏確實沒有提到這個戰役。
-糯米粥-
♀
(175 bytes)
()
08/01/2022 postreply
12:23:23
•
英美史學界也是不帶偏見的多
-papyrus-
♂
(114 bytes)
()
08/01/2022 postreply
12:38:42
•
我猜糯米並不是對曆史本身感興趣,而是對不同的“視角”感興趣;和平年代的讀者們容易催生出爭奇鬥豔的作者與書籍,包括哈利波特
-土豆-禾苗-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/01/2022 postreply
13:18:42
•
還是男神最懂得淺薄的我!我不太愛看學術性的正經曆史書(讀了打瞌睡啊), 喜歡讀那種intimate picture
-糯米粥-
♀
(363 bytes)
()
08/01/2022 postreply
13:28:38
•
看到了,謝謝分享!
-糯米粥-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
08/01/2022 postreply
13:20:59