誠懇征集正方、反方的觀點:“The Impact of the Phonetic Alphabet on the Develop

本文內容已被 [ star-sun ] 在 2012-10-18 08:19:03 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

誠懇征集正方、反方的觀點:“The Impact of the Phonetic Alphabet on the Development of Western Civilizatioin”

Sincerely listen different points of view from you:“The Impact of the Phonetic Alphabet on the Development of Western Civilizatioin”

Sincèrement écouter différents points de vue de votre part:“The Impact of the Phonetic Alphabet on the Development of Western Civilizatioin”

最近,在讀這本書,受益不淺,疑問不少,浮想連翩。

不想先聲奪人,所以,在此拋書引玉,誠懇征集正方、反方的觀點。說是正方,反方,更嚴謹一點,應該說是多方的觀點。

Book: The Impact of the Phonetic Alphabet on the Development of Western Civilizatioin

Published: 1986, 265 pages

Author: Robert K. Logan, Ph.D.

From seminal work done in collaboration with Marshall McLuhan, Robert K. Logan creates an intriguing synthesis of ideas about the effect of alphabets on the development of civilizations.

Robert K. Logan's The Alphabet Effect is a fascinating study of the evolution of writing systems. It describes the dramatic role the phonetic alphabet has played in the development of Western Civilization, in contrast with the role of pictographic writing systems in China and elsewhere. From the use of notched sticks or symbols first used in ancient times, to the alphabets in common use today, he draws a variety of conclusions about how societies advance. Logan also show how the advent of mass communications and use of computers affecct how we communicate.

Dr. Logan is a physics professor at the University of Toronto, cross-appointed to the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, where he teaches and carries out research in the field of computer applications in education. Fo six years he collaborated with Marshall McLuhan, with whom he published two articles.

"Any reader who suspects that language is what makes us human will appreciate this excellent overview of linguistic, educational, and communications theory"

- excerpted from the back cover of this book

Flag Counter
free counters

所有跟帖: 

Sincerely listen different points of view from you:“The Impact o -star-sun- 給 star-sun 發送悄悄話 star-sun 的博客首頁 (698 bytes) () 10/18/2012 postreply 07:24:20

感興趣。網上有原文嗎?多謝。我從來就認為象形字對中國文化有致命影響,而且是優勢。 :) -還是沒筆名- 給 還是沒筆名 發送悄悄話 還是沒筆名 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2012 postreply 11:13:30

網上貌似木有原文~~。此書不貴,少吃一隻麵包,就能買下。我是在這裏定購的: -star-sun- 給 star-sun 發送悄悄話 star-sun 的博客首頁 (425 bytes) () 10/18/2012 postreply 17:24:26

多謝。我好奇的是他有沒有比較象形字和東方文化? 好像他的意思是西方發達主要歸功於拚音文字的優越,是吧? -還是沒筆名- 給 還是沒筆名 發送悄悄話 還是沒筆名 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2012 postreply 19:21:55

是的,他以大手筆,大跨度地作了比較,他的意思是西方發達主要歸功於拚音文字的優越,這是他的主要觀點之一。 他是從公元前6000年 -star-sun- 給 star-sun 發送悄悄話 star-sun 的博客首頁 (15066 bytes) () 10/19/2012 postreply 07:17:54

這個說法好像一直就有,不知他書裏的新意是什麽。按說不比較象形字和東方文化,單討論拚音的優越有點片麵。 -還是沒筆名- 給 還是沒筆名 發送悄悄話 還是沒筆名 的博客首頁 (78 bytes) () 10/19/2012 postreply 10:38:16

期待著大家跳出該文章的框架和體係結構,陳述一些多方的觀點耶~~ -star-sun- 給 star-sun 發送悄悄話 star-sun 的博客首頁 (67 bytes) () 10/19/2012 postreply 10:54:05

我覺得字母和象形文字都各有利弊。希望有本書能綜合全麵地總結 - 好像這書還沒出來 :) -還是沒筆名- 給 還是沒筆名 發送悄悄話 還是沒筆名 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/19/2012 postreply 11:03:51

同意!我覺得使用拚音文字的文明猶如金庸小說中的邪派武功,出功快, -wjsun- 給 wjsun 發送悄悄話 wjsun 的博客首頁 (164 bytes) () 10/23/2012 postreply 16:46:04

發帖已有一周了,繼續期待驚人之語。。 -star-sun- 給 star-sun 發送悄悄話 star-sun 的博客首頁 (43 bytes) () 10/26/2012 postreply 07:10:35

不同意該作者的觀點 -老老農民- 給 老老農民 發送悄悄話 (308 bytes) () 12/21/2012 postreply 20:57:04

不同意該作者的觀點 -老老農民- 給 老老農民 發送悄悄話 (180 bytes) () 12/26/2012 postreply 16:56:29

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!