->很多所謂的IE問題不是單純的IE問題，而是係統的問題。(不是微軟才有係統問題)
It is not 單純的IE問題, but a IE design problems - binding is the culprit (or we can say Windows design problems, but IE is an application on Windows). Let's simplify it. If there is no binding, IE can be much more free from the security troubles and protects Windows better. Binding is two side blade.
->用FF/Opera不解決係統的問題。就這麽簡單。
That's true. Both behaves excelent on different platforms. They have less security problems on OS.
->對同一個用戶而言，如果你有心去裝FF等，你也可以用那些時間/精力配好IE並更新係統，補上漏洞。後者才是關鍵。
Do you mean it takes the same "時間/精力配好IE並更新係統，補上漏洞" as that to install FF? If so, can you please give us your value results?
->FF的很多功能在基於IE的外殼上都可以實現，而且這些外殼有很多FF沒有的功能。而這些外殼往往比FF要小得多。
Do you know how many customers know how to use 外殼? Is the 外殼 the browser or IE?
It is not 單純的IE問題, but a IE design problems - binding is the culprit (or we can say Windows design problems, but IE is an application on Windows). Let's simplify it. If there is no binding, IE can be much more free from the security troubles and protects Windows better. Binding is two side blade.
->用FF/Opera不解決係統的問題。就這麽簡單。
That's true. Both behaves excelent on different platforms. They have less security problems on OS.
->對同一個用戶而言，如果你有心去裝FF等，你也可以用那些時間/精力配好IE並更新係統，補上漏洞。後者才是關鍵。
Do you mean it takes the same "時間/精力配好IE並更新係統，補上漏洞" as that to install FF? If so, can you please give us your value results?
->FF的很多功能在基於IE的外殼上都可以實現，而且這些外殼有很多FF沒有的功能。而這些外殼往往比FF要小得多。
Do you know how many customers know how to use 外殼? Is the 外殼 the browser or IE?
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
