沒戲，intel的死穴就是做不出低功耗的芯片，你慢慢等，嗬嗬

所有跟帖： 

• your statement is too early. Intel new tech will change that -playForever- ♂ (722 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 14:56:19

• tablet不可能用6-cell battery 15瓦離兩三瓦還有很長的路要走，嗬嗬 -?ttу- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:04:55

• 15W CPU for laptop/notebook. Not for tablet -playForever- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:18:06

• 估計Intel最後不了了之 -?ttу- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:20:31

• Intel feel the pressure. How can it 不了了之? -playForever- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:25:09

• 沒人用隻好不了了之 - 他們十幾年前就企圖搞手機芯片，但是沒成功 -?ttу- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:29:06

• There will be market for x86 tablets, let's see. -playForever- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:33:31

• 但是通常來說好點多，使用時間短 -?ttу- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:35:36

• 耗電多，使用時間短 -?ttу- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:47:49

• ipad/ipad 2用的都是25瓦時的電池，要過10小時，整機功耗不能過2.5瓦 -?ttу- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:13:10

• cpu大概不能超過2瓦 -?ttу- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:13:49

• 2W is not big deal after moving to 22nm -playForever- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:20:52

• 你聽Intel瞎吹，當初他們搞CULV cpu也沒實現減少功耗的目的 -?ttу- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 15:22:17

• From Oak Trail spec. Its 1.5GHZ version is only 3W -playForever- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/23/2011 postreply 22:26:31