確實,差不了太多。

來源: wooddiy 2010-06-29 14:52:56 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (909 bytes)
ironically, the difference is not at the electronic side, but rather physically side:
1, do you like clear image? Find a larger sensor size, not just MP but real dimension of the sensor.
2, do you like to use it everywhere? Find a solid build one.
3, do you want to have good experience? Find a larger sized LCD
4, do you travel? Find a better optical zoom (digital zoom is trash).
5, do you want to last longer? Find a solid build one.

so all the "nice to have" will cost you money. If you just want to take in light for shadow recording, $50 is good enough. $10 one-time-use film camera is cheaper.

It is also hard to say which one is the most important. Some may like to pay $300 extra just for a "cool" looking; some like to pay that much for a 10X optical zoom.

The most important and most difficult part is you, what do you want? Know the answer, know the camera.

所有跟帖: 

查著字典讀了好半天,懂了,無敵先生,向來說話條理分明 -DriveThru- 給 DriveThru 發送悄悄話 DriveThru 的博客首頁 (198 bytes) () 06/30/2010 postreply 00:19:42

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”