幾款筆記本性能的比較，僅供參考

這裏比較的是聯想的u330舊款，新款cpu P8600的，網上還找不到

Performance

System performance with the ATI Radeon 3450 dedicated graphics and the Intel P7350 Core 2 Duo processor was excellent. The system handled mild gaming without a problem and normal acitivity was without any lag (once you removed most of the bloatware). One advantage of having a switchable graphics system is one minute you can be playing around in a game, and another you are sipping slowly off battery power using integrated graphics. Lenovo handles this transition without needing to reboot the system with a simple right click on the desktop and selecting "Configure Switchable Graphics." The switch takes only a few seconds and power usage drops significantly. Besides gaming, I found leaving it in the Intel graphics mode worked out best. The system consumes less power, puts off less heat, and still ran all of the 3D features of Vista without a problem. The PCMark Vantage synthetic benchmark returned a reasonably impressive score of 3,232.



WPrime 32M comparison results:

WPrime is a benchmark similar to Super Pi in that it forces the processor to do intense mathematical calculations, but the difference is this application is multi-threaded and represents dual core processors better. Lower numbers indicate better performance.


Notebook / CPU wPrime 32M time
Lenovo IdeaPad U330 (Core 2 Duo P7350 @ 2.0GHz) 38.222s
Dell Inspiron 13 (Pentium Dual Core T2390 @ 1.86GHz) 44.664s
Dell Studio 15 (Core 2 Duo T5750 @ 2.0GHz) 41.246s
HP Pavilion dv5z (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 @ 2.1GHz) 39.745s

Toshiba Satellite U405 (Core 2 Duo T8100 @ 2.1GHz) 37.500s
Dell Vostro 1510 (Core 2 Duo T5670 @ 1.8GHz) 51.875s

Dell Inspiron 1525 (Core 2 Duo T7250 @ 2.0GHz) 43.569s

Dell XPS M1530 (Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz) 37.485s
HP Pavilion dv6500z (Turion 64 X2 TL-60 @ 2.0GHz) 40.759s

Sony VAIO NR (Core 2 Duo T5250 @ 1.5GHz) 58.233s
Toshiba Tecra A9 (Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz) 38.343s
Toshiba Tecra M9 (Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz) 37.299s
HP Compaq 6910p (Core 2 Duo T7300 @ 2GHz) 40.965s
Lenovo T61 (Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz) 37.705s
HP Pavilion dv6000z (Turion X2 TL-60 @ 2.0GHz) 38.720s


PCMark05 measures overall notebook performance based on processor, hard drive, operating system, RAM, and graphics (higher scores are better):


Notebook PCMark05 Score
Lenovo IdeaPad U330 (2.0GHz Intel P7350, ATI Radeon 3450 with 256MB DDR3) 4,801 PCMarks
Lenovo IdeaPad U330 (2.0GHz Intel P7350, Intel X4500) 4,224 PCMarks

Dell Inspiron 13 (1.86GHz Intel T2390, Intel X3100) 3,727 PCMarks
Dell Studio 15 (2.0GHz Intel T5750, Intel X3100)
3,998 PCMarks

HP Pavilion dv5z (2.1GHz Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, ATI Radeon HD 3200)
3,994 PCMarks

Toshiba Satellite U405 (2.1GHz Intel T8100, Intel X3100) 4,145 PCMarks
Dell Vostro 1510 (1.8GHz Intel T5670, Intel X3100)
3,568 PCMarks
Dell Inspiron 1525 (2.0GHz Intel T7250, Intel X3100) 4,149 PCMarks

Dell XPS M1530 (2.20GHz Intel T7500, Nvidia 8600M GT 256MB) 5,412 PCMarks
Dell Inspiron 1520 (2.0GHz Intel T7300, NVIDIA 8600M GT) 4,616 PCMarks
Sony VAIO NR (1.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T5250, Intel X3100) 3,283 PCMarks
Lenovo T60 Widescreen (2.0GHz Intel T7200, ATI X1400 128MB) 4,189 PCMarks
HP dv6000t (2.16GHz Intel T7400, NVIDA GeForce Go 7400) 4,234 PCMarks




http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4696

所有跟帖： 

• 嗬嗬，你肯定是火狐粉絲^_^ -搗亂mm- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/22/2008 postreply 07:24:38

• 火狐是啥木東東？~~~~~ -油猴- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/22/2008 postreply 07:36:09

• 看過金庸的神雕麽？火狐跟那個神雕差不多羅，哢哢^_~ -搗亂mm- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/22/2008 postreply 07:44:36

• 神雕是天上飛的，油猴是樹上爬的，火狐是地上走的，不同啊！ -π- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/22/2008 postreply 12:41:36

• 共同點就是麽： -Α- ♀ (56 bytes) () 11/22/2008 postreply 17:50:12

• 更正 -油猴- ♂ (153 bytes) () 11/22/2008 postreply 22:32:59

• 哦，那現在一樣了，共同點是： -π- ♂ (14 bytes) () 11/23/2008 postreply 05:40:30

• how do you compare X61s and X200? -whyusername- ♂ (17 bytes) () 11/23/2008 postreply 10:16:26