You're right, QQQI 不是衍生品。我應該把上麵改成JEPI 和 JPEQ

所有跟帖: 

It can be defined as a derivative, tho sometimes, humans see -曉炎- 給 曉炎 發送悄悄話 曉炎 的博客首頁 (322 bytes) () 12/14/2025 postreply 07:52:08

i am mainly against all covered call ETF -三心三意- 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 三心三意 的博客首頁 (100 bytes) () 12/14/2025 postreply 07:56:04

Respectfully disagree :) think this way, how many people -曉炎- 給 曉炎 發送悄悄話 曉炎 的博客首頁 (362 bytes) () 12/14/2025 postreply 08:01:32

I dont think you read my last reply carefully) -三心三意- 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 三心三意 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/14/2025 postreply 08:16:55

I did... I don't think you read my recap above with an open -曉炎- 給 曉炎 發送悄悄話 曉炎 的博客首頁 (369 bytes) () 12/14/2025 postreply 08:22:00

為啥 qqqi 不是衍生品? 好像也是搞 CC 的啊 -snowwhite76- 給 snowwhite76 發送悄悄話 (744 bytes) () 12/14/2025 postreply 08:08:08

Damn, i got confused. LOL. I was thinking about QQQE -三心三意- 給 三心三意 發送悄悄話 三心三意 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/14/2025 postreply 08:20:36

也是 -bogbog- 給 bogbog 發送悄悄話 bogbog 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/14/2025 postreply 15:14:50

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!