China GDP vs. US GDP

本文內容已被 [ quantnj ] 在 2012-11-26 09:54:56 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

In 2011, US GDP was $15.1T and China GDP was $7.3T. Assuming US continuously grows at annual rate of 2% and China at 7%, it would take China for 15 years to catch up. However, there are 2 big variables:

1. Can China grow at annual rate of 7% each year in the next 15 years. It was easier from $1,000 per capita but would be a challenge when it started around $5,000 per capita in 2011. This phenomenon occured in many developing countries. Korea and Taiwan are only two economies with population over 20M which have enjoyed sustained growth for more than 2 decades after reaching $5,000 threshold;

2. RMB appreciation. If RMB appreciates vs. USD, it will take shorter for China to catch up. But RMB appreciation will dampen exports, which will make 7% growth much less likely.

From the trend in last 2 years, it seems capital are moving out of China. Thus, I am not so optimistic about growth potential in China. 

 

-----

2011 rate 5 10 15
US 15.1 2.0% 16.7 18.4 20.3
China 7.3 7.0% 10.2 14.4 20.1

所有跟帖: 

not as much as China. FYI -sleepdonkey- 給 sleepdonkey 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:06:41

here it is, take a look by yourself, , -sleepdonkey- 給 sleepdonkey 發送悄悄話 (338 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:14:25

貨幣增發量/每年。 你這個都看不懂還敢講, 有你的。 -sleepdonkey- 給 sleepdonkey 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:20:00

He can't read anything other than Chinese -mknc- 給 mknc 發送悄悄話 mknc 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:22:49

圖標上不是有嗎?, bloomberg的數據,。要不你也去弄一個數據? -sleepdonkey- 給 sleepdonkey 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:29:14

To make the matter worse, China keeps buying US treasury bills, -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (95 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:25:04

唉, 看不懂你們吵啥。 -sleepdonkey- 給 sleepdonkey 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:23:02

1949? -mknc- 給 mknc 發送悄悄話 mknc 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:23:42

最井底蛙的 -野生動物攝影家- 給 野生動物攝影家 發送悄悄話 野生動物攝影家 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 11:39:20

GDP is not too meaningful. -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (328 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:13:02

What about making it up China GDP growth at 70% per annum -Cherrylover- 給 Cherrylover 發送悄悄話 (173 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:19:20

回複:China GDP vs. US GDP -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (835 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:19:29

哈哈,很形像。美國的GDP大部分都是這種吃狗屎的,叫做SERVICES -相對強度- 給 相對強度 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:24:24

看來你的理解力有限呀 -pieq314- 給 pieq314 發送悄悄話 pieq314 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:28:44

It's easy. Just cook the book. haha. -999朵玫瑰- 給 999朵玫瑰 發送悄悄話 999朵玫瑰 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:31:10

在全球化時代,跨國公司全球經營,統計一國的GDP並不反映該國的強弱 -虎落平原- 給 虎落平原 發送悄悄話 虎落平原 的博客首頁 (359 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:37:20

就目前來說,中國的航母並沒有戰略價值。具強大攻防能力的航母群才有戰鬥力。 -虎落平原- 給 虎落平原 發送悄悄話 虎落平原 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:54:49

Every single developed country has service taking 65%+ of GDP. -Warsteiner- 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (160 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:55:30

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!