representing top 1%. an individual's succss in business should be asset not liabiity. as a matter of fact, some wealthy guys like bloomberg have done a great job after being elected. romney is considered quite liberal in many social issues by many far rights. but i think his business style approach may work in solving deficit and spending issue since this country has been run by career politicians for so long time. his another attribute i like is he can work woth other parties, which obama seems lacking of.
he is very successful but it doesn't mean he must be
所有跟帖:
•
You totally got me wrong. 我說他代表1%的富人利益並不是因為他本身是富人.
-999朵玫瑰-
♀
(107 bytes)
()
10/03/2012 postreply
20:42:59