not really,

although this is probably the first (and a good) counter argument most people would use. i think overall it's a net positive to human society.

☆ 發自Android 文學城閱覽器 5.5

所有跟帖： 

• 我的意思是：政府無端幹預上市公司分配數額和方式，又沒有效方法去預測幹預的後果＝共產初級 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/14/2012 postreply 07:07:49

• publicly traded company 事關 public interest.政府有權監管。私人企業隨你jue. -xdz2- ♀ (118 bytes) () 09/14/2012 postreply 07:13:05

• 這裏說的public interest實際是interest of shareholders -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/14/2012 postreply 07:17:31

• true, and employees的 -xdz2- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/14/2012 postreply 07:18:56

• no. shareholders only. -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/14/2012 postreply 07:21:39

• 嚴格來講 -xdz2- ♀ (69 bytes) () 09/14/2012 postreply 07:30:07